The intro borders those three
words: past, present and future. Marco explains that one person’s present could
be another’s future, but one change in roads can modify that.
Kublai Khan, the reader, asks Marco
Polo, the author, if the purpose of these travels is to relive the past or
recover the future. Marco responds by saying, “ The traveler recognizes the
little that is his, discovering the much he has not had and will never have,”
(29). That sentence is divided in times, ‘…little that is his…’ represents the
present, ‘…much he has not had…’ represents the past and ‘…will never have…’
represents the future. He already knows what he has, and then he visits the
cities and sees things that he knows he never had in the past. Then, along the
lines with what this intro is trying to say, he realizes that what he sees he
can never have because he chose to take a different road compared to other
people.
Marco says that the more one was
lost in unfamiliar cities, the more one understands the other cities. All of
them connect in some way. For example, in section 3, the first three chapters
mention women. Not just that they are there, but they play a main part in the
city. Perhaps the cities symbolize his life. Shown in Cities & Desire 5, there is a woman who keeps running away,
but once they try to keep the women in one place, she cannot be found. This may
represent something in Marcos life. We do not know what, but it may be a lost
love.
As I read the first Trading Cities, I thought that maybe all
the descriptions of the cities have a bit of each characteristic, for example:
memories, desires or signs. Except, they are named the way they are, because
each one has a little more of one topic. In Trading
Cities it mentions that, “…you start summoning up your memories one by
one…” it mentions about memories, but the overall ‘theme’ is about trading. On
page 36 it says, “…At each word the one man says…the others tell, each one…”
the city is trading stories that one man shared.
In section two, Cities & Desire 4 really connects with the italics part in
the beginning because, just like mentioned in the intro, Fedora, the city, also
brings up the ‘what if’ question. One main question that is asked in this
chapter is, “How would Fedora look if other events happened,” and it links
with, “How would my life look if I took another road”. On page 32 you can
clearly see what I mean, “…the waters of the canal (if it had not been dried
up)…” and a couple more of those. This city is imagining another city,
resembling this one, but one they like better. They are longing for a city that
they desiring.
Kublai Khan doubts Marco Polo a
bit, whether or not these cities really do exist, or is he just messing with
his mind and repeating detail. Just like the readers might be thinking about
Calvino. Is he really telling us the truth? Do these cities really exist? It is
possible that these cities are all a story. They lead to something, represent
something in a relationship. All these cities are an emblem that we are still
trying to figure out. They are going to lead us to understand the truth behind the
connection between Kublai Khan and Marco Polo.
No comments:
Post a Comment